Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom


Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom book. Happy reading Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Pocket Guide.


A Dangerous Man

Details the destruction of our Constitution but does not give any ideas as to how to correct the problem. However, in my opinion, there is a key sentence in the founding documents, The Declaration of Indepencdence, which gives the answer. Go read and see. May 02, Tim rated it it was amazing. A fantastic book that details exactly how two long revered presidents used their power to twist the Constitution to their liking.

Public schools that I attended and work in still seem to mostly teach the greatness of T. Any American who wants a better understanding of where we are today should read this book. Dec 16, Mark Geise rated it liked it. Judge Nap is not the greatest writer out there, but he does a very good job at scaring and exciting the reader. I generally align politically with Napolitano, so I agree with the vast majority of what he writes in the book. At the same time, I do not believe he does a good enough job to convince people across the aisle that he is correct.

I think anyone that reads this book will rightfully see Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson in a different light than they had previously, assuming their previous knowledge of the two came from school or from progressive-leaning historians. However, I find his support of libertarian-leaning ideals to be under-supported in some instances throughout the book, which is a disservice if he wishes to convince readers with different political outlooks that he is correct.

Both Roosevelt and Wilson distrusted the judgment of the average person and believed that the government should step in to regulate behaviors, economic transactions, and employer-employee relationships. There was more than a hint of racism in all of these policies; both men were extremely racist.

These two presidents had no regard for the Constitution and were able to circumvent it in seemingly countless ways. These presidential actions, accepted by courts as legal, serve as defense for unconstitutional presidential actions today. While I believe that our big government policies today have a lot in common with the visions of these two men, progressive policies did not begin with them.

Napolitano mentions Lincoln several times, pointing at his disregard for the Constitution, but I believe he could have done a better job explaining the lead-up to the Roosevelt and Wilson presidencies and connection their ideas to the Lincoln presidency. All that was needed were two men without regard for the Constitution that could bull their way through constitutional limits to bring these ideas to fruition. Napolitano is always entertaining, so I enjoyed the read.

I think it had the potential to be much more informative, but I believe that it would be very difficult for anyone to read this book and still believe that these men were good presidents. He seems murky on Austrian economics and on economics in general, so do not expect too much in that department. The top marginal tax rate is synonymous with the rate paid by incomes within the highest tax rates, but all of the rates in the various tax brackets are marginal.

I also believe that he was calling deposits held at a bank an asset of the bank, rather than a liability. I read and reread what he wrote, and I cannot see another way to interpret this apparent mistake. He has a tendency to intertwine fact with opinion without clearly separating the two.

Anyway, though, he is great at what he knows, and in this case that is the Constitution. He explains Supreme Court cases in extremely accessible terms and relates them well to the wording of the Constitution and the debates surrounding the ratification of the Constitution. Mar 24, David Sheedy rated it it was ok. It was a well written book but I feel that a lot of his conclusions very broad and, I do not agree with a lot of his conclusions regarding United States participation in the great war, and the long term world impact of that participation.

Jun 06, James rated it it was ok. He got a bit preachy about half way through and lost his message. Dec 05, Robin Case rated it really liked it. I used the audio version. This is a pretty well done production. The book is more a political and social analysis than a biography.

More a light hearted fun read. Dec 10, Matt Simpson rated it it was ok. Those who should read: Anyone who already hates big government looking for more talking points to belligerently toss around comment boards and angry social media rants. Also, those who do not require intellectual justification for what they believe and who do not believe in nuanced ideas or the complexity of history.

Those who should not read: Anyone interested in engaging other intelligent beings in convincing debate. Also those who enjoy thoroughly supported and well reasoned arguments. For a Those who should read: Anyone who already hates big government looking for more talking points to belligerently toss around comment boards and angry social media rants. For a book whose thesis and main points I tend to agree with more often than not I was astonishingly disappointed with the author throughout most of this book.

Unfortunately, what could have been a compelling narrative with great potential for explaining much about the course of the last century's political evolution falls far short of even making a coherent argument. Accusations of evil intent are casually thrown at Roosevelt and Wilson, but justifications for these accusations are few and far between. These vague attempts do little except squander the opportunity to engage readers in a timely discussion about the proper authority of the federal government.

Contradictions are common and are passed off so casually as to make the reader wonder if the author is aware of the conflicts within his text or if he is actually so ideologically vapid that he hasn't even noticed his own contradictions. The author can't seem to decide if big businessmen of the progressive era are heroes worthy of Atlas Shrugged or dastardly collaborators complicit in the reckless expansion of the federal government.

This subject is worthy of exploration and the thesis of the book isn't without merit. However, this book does not satisfy the demands of coherent argumentation or basic academic investigation. Feb 08, Patrick S. His understanding of the law and Constitution is, sadly, a breath of fresh air.

In this book it was interesting to see that Napolitano looks at the then history of Theodore and Woodrow but also shows what outcomes came from their actions - even those leading up to today. This book isn't highly technical. It's not a page indepth study of the two men. That is up the reader. Napolitano makes his case that the t Ever since Judge Napolitano went on John Stossel's show, I've been a huge, huge fan. Napolitano makes his case that the two men were as close to dictators that this country had and the policies they wrought still have lasting consequences.

memes catalog

The best thing about this book is the sound, logical, and Constitutionally pointed to arguements that Napolitano is an expert at making. He really is a joy to read and listen to when he's on TV. The one downside to this book is that in the middle when talking about the war lust of the men, especially Theodore, it tends to get bogged down in history more than anything.

I understand the points he's making and why he's giving the history, but it was a little slow around those parts. He also tends to sight in on Theodore more than Woodrow. Again, I can see why but if you wanted to learn more about Woodrow then you may be disappointed. I'm not sure how someone on the other side of the isle would say about this book - on whether it makes fair accusations. I think he does a fair job. I think Napolitano characterizes Theodore especially right on. If you're a fan of limited governemtn, the Constitution, and a honest critique of two Presidents that you learned about in school that were oh so great and awesome men - check this book out.

Final Grade - A Feb 17, Toni L. Very, very good. Insightful history. The Judge hit out of the park. However, it's also very depressing and disgusting when you see exactly how corrupt and self-serving politicians are. We know these things but the way Napolitano spells it out makes us realize how limited our awareness and understanding is.

Nov 06, Justin Poe rated it it was ok. Very disappointed with this book. Judge Napolitano is a staunch dyed in the wool libertarian and he makes no bones about it in this book. Now, I'm no fan of Woodrow Wilson or Teddy Roosevelt but this book has chapters in it taken right out of the libertarian playbook that just had me scratching my head at times. I guess I have a hard time buying into this evil Progressive plan to take over the world theory that keeps popping up in this book.

I don't think Teddy thought as deeply about these is Very disappointed with this book. I don't think Teddy thought as deeply about these issues as what the Judge does in his book. Racism seems to be an underlying theme throughout and creeps in in every argument. I had a hard time even getting through the chapters on the draft and drugs as they were so outlandish and riddled with errors, or at the very least, Libertarian talking points.

Sadly, this book is less about history and more about a "wacko" political agenda. Libertarians while I agree with a lot of their issue always go off on the deep end on others. He fills in the gaps and arguments with talking points and assumptions. Libertarians will love it.

How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom

For a staunch conservative like myself Over the top talking points is all I got out of this. Nov 23, John Martindale rated it really liked it Shelves: audiobook , history , politics. This book was so unsettling and infuriating, why do i subject myself to such torture? A few precious years were likely drained from my life due to the added stress. Yeah, I had to take it in, in small doses, for I was getting weary of shaking my head in astonishment and disgust.

Oh my word, what dastardly evil, evil, evil men!

Brilliance Publishing

This book is one horrific story after another of the multitude of injustices Americans have endured or have perished of, as a result of "Progressive" politicians grabbing This book was so unsettling and infuriating, why do i subject myself to such torture?

This book is one horrific story after another of the multitude of injustices Americans have endured or have perished of, as a result of "Progressive" politicians grabbing power in utter disregard for the constitution. It just shows me that the Constitution is kind of like the little rope and peg that keeps the Elephant stationary. The ropes only power is psychological, and Lincoln, Theodore, Woodrow, FDR, Bush and Obama And the slew of them in-between knew this and had little regard for the constitution, and yeah, like with the Elephant that pulls the rope, there is nothing about the constitution that can hold them back.

Since there is no justice at the Supreme Court and the whole congressional system is corrupt, there is no one to hold them accountable and there are not even any whistle blowers because the mainstream media is in bed with progressive politicians. It's simple sick. Nov 29, Michael rated it really liked it. I always enjoying reading the Judge's books. For the most part I thought the that the book gave valid points about the government encroaching on our personal freedoms.

How the government has become a paternal government instead of one that defends our freedom. Some of the problems that occurred or where talked about in the book were a little of a stretch to say that they were solely Theodore and Woodrow's initiated like the federal reserve, racism, and income tax. Did they play an major role in I always enjoying reading the Judge's books. Did they play an major role in these? But these were building up for years and these men were the catalyst. I think for the most part the Judge presents the truth. The book is definitely one sided, which is something that I don't like.

I am a libertarian because I find this party to be of sound mind. They look at both sides and find the truth and errors in both. I wish I would have seen more of the good and bad instead of solely just the bad. I want to make it clear that I thoroughly enjoyed reading this book! I suggest that everyone read history books because "those who are ignorant of the past are doomed to repeat it.

Feb 16, Lee Button rated it it was amazing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Teddy was a bully. Woodrow was a cagey egotist. Though in different parties both men were progressives. Judge Napolitano lays out clear evidence that these men turned the Constitution into a game board. And they were determined to win by cheating.

Americans are still losing because of how low these 2 of the worst 10 presidents set the executive standard of fealty. Imperialism, racism, elitism, their common faith. Teddy had wanted to fight a war from childhood. When it was suggested but never pro Teddy was a bully. When it was suggested but never proved that Spain had sunk the Maine he rushed up San Juan hill and raced the nation to unconstitutional conquests his whole presidency. Wilson had to have a war and allowed over Americans to be killed on the Lusitania; he knew the ship would likely be attacked. The Great war was the result.

American Imperialism- making the world safe for democracy since Both men were clearly racists and self-centered. This is the book that sets the record straight. This book is a great look at history with century's worth of political commentary that clarifies the situation we find ourself in today. If anything it gives Americans a bread crumb trail to turning America around, reclaiming the freedom we once had, and reaping the benefits of the system our nation's Founders established for us; the system which exponentially raised the standard of living around the world.


  1. Commentary?
  2. Best Sellers;
  3. Account Options;

Unfortunately this bread crumb trail of destruction is not so much a trail as it is an oc This book is a great look at history with century's worth of political commentary that clarifies the situation we find ourself in today. Unfortunately this bread crumb trail of destruction is not so much a trail as it is an ocean that will require a tremendous amount of resolve and patience on the part of the voting citizenry, traits neither of which have been common to 21st century Americans.

Seeing the big picture like this, despite recognizing it's Goliath appearance, is nevertheless encouraging. I only wish everyone would read this. Jul 28, James rated it liked it Shelves: history. I wanted to give this book 4 stars Let me begin with the fact that I enjoyed the historical portion and believe that for the most part he characterizes Roosevelt and Wilson correctly. We need more books that are anti-progressive and this is definitely one. However, the writing is average and he does digress on a few personal diatribes as well as some extensive criticism of Bush and Obama Note: I am not opposed to this but it doesn't fit with the book's original purpose.

I do feel that some I wanted to give this book 4 stars I do feel that some of it is warranted and even an appropriate tie in to history. However, it is a bit overdone and may turn some readers off.

Theodore and Woodrow

And Americans still pay for their legacy—in the federal income, in state-prescribed compulsory education, in the Federal Reserve, in perpetual wars, and in the constant encroachment of a government that coddles special interests and discourages true competition in the marketplace.

Napolitano claims that Roosevelt and Wilson pushed aside the traditionally accepted and constitutionally mandated restrictions on the federal government and used it as an instrument to redistribute wealth, regulate personal behavior, enrich the government, and enhance the government s health with wars. Napolitano repeatedly links what he views as Roosevelt s and Wilson s Progressive era folly and perfidy to the present, claiming that Wilson instituted the federal income tax we know today, which the authors calls theft and that, thanks to Roosevelt s foreign meddling, the U.

This hit job takes on the Federal Reserve, compulsory education, industrial regulation, and race with equal lack of subtlety. GTN works with clients to design a program featuring the perfect celebrity spokesperson for specific events or campaigns. Pitbull Pitbull. Trending Topics View All. Creative Conversations. Current Events.

Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom
Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom
Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom
Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom
Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom
Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom
Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom
Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom

Related Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom



Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved