First one must understand what we are dealing with. Certain drugs are much more serious than others. LSD was originally produced as an elephant tranquilizer and can obviously cause very violent and serious effects. There have been incidents of people, high on LSD, ripping their hands out of hand-cuffs, by breaking every bone in their hands. Cocaine and crack are much more prevalent, very addictive, and can kill you the very first time you try them. Many will remember the great promise of basketball player Len Bias, whose life was taken after one night of experimentation with Cocaine.
Heroine use is very addictive, leaves its users feeling and looking empty, and the spread of AIDS is proliferated by the sharing of needles for this drug. Should Marijuana fit into this category? A scientific study funded by the White House says no. The study gave no proof that this gateway phenomenon existed, and seemed to point in the direction of at least reconsidering our current position on Marijuana.
It is clear to me that Marijuana does not belong in the same category as the other drugs, and the proposition of legalization should be seriously considered. What do we have to enjoy from legalizing Marijuana, and possibly other drugs, or at least regulating there use? Consider the experiences of Holland--a country where drugs fall under the jurisdiction of health agencies, not law enforcement, which has seen a decline in chronic use of hard drugs and casual use of soft drugs since decriminalization. If illegal drugs are so obviously harmful to people's health, why is it necessary to put so many American adults in prison to prevent them from using these drugs?
If people want to take drugs, people are going to find a way to get drugs. The problem is the war on drugs is not attacking the right people. I feel the last figures are the most telling. It just seems like the purpose of the war on drugs has been lost, and as a result of the powers that be not accepting an alternative, other battles are being lost as well. Currently this is not the case, and this is just another example of a need for change.
Another major problem with our current situation is money. Not only is it expensive to prosecute drug offenders, it is expensive to detain them. Currently, more money is being put into building prisons than into building schools. In , 16 billion dollars were spent in federal funding for the war on drugs.
The Complicated History of Cannabis in the US
If all this time and money is being spent on education, and prevention, and treatment, and the numbers continue to rise, then an alternative must be sought. As immoral and ridiculous as legalization may seem to some, all the facts seem to show that it, at the very least, deserves consideration. Without a solution to the current situation, the U. Where do we go from here? Clearly major steps need to be taken. The next step must be to find out what the opinion is on the streets and in the schools. Do the education and awareness efforts work? What makes someone decide to try drugs?
What is the biggest influence on the child? Maybe by taking note of what other countries have done, for example Holland which was mentioned earlier, the U.
Propaganda of Mexican Drug War
It seems to me that the U. What must be realized is that changing our policies is not an admission of defeat. The bottom line is that drug use needs to be reduced, the murders must be brought down, and the number of people incarcerated must be decreased. The modern drug war began in the s, and for thirty five years it has failed to produce and real success. Which is better for America during the next 35 years, prohibition with the continuing costs and ineffectiveness, or reform policies that approach the problem from a different angle.
Instead of spending so much money on imprisoning drug offenders and preaching why drugs are bad, why not spend the money on schools, and school programs? The idea is to keep kids from using drugs, and this will in turn reduce the numbers of adults that use drugs. The same goal is present in alcohol and cigarettes, and it is handled much differently.
Why not treat at least Marijuana just like cigarettes and alcohol. Education is a must, but prosecuting small time offenders is pointless. Consider some facts and costs that this country has undertaken as a result of attempting to make drug use illegal. I will end this report with some outlined problems with keeping drugs illegal. There is a need for change, and this must be realized soon:.
How Duterte Used Facebook To Fuel the Philippine Drug War
The war on drugs has failed. By making drugs illegal, this country has:. The difference is the amount we are willing to pay to criminals for the privilege of keeping the drug illegal. Not only that, but such a high markup is strong incentive for people to enter into the sales and trafficking of these drugs. The stiff penalties we assess against drug dealers only makes the price higher and the criminals more desperate to escape capture, more determined to protect their market from encroachment.
If drugs were legalized, the price would drop by to a tiny fraction of their current street values and the incentive to push drugs would vanish. Recall that during prohibition, bootleggers and police used to shoot it out over black market 'shine. Illegal speakeasies did a booming trade, the profits of which went to organized crime.
With the end of prohibition, alcohol has been taxed and provides a revenue stream to the State. Would drug use go up? But it might well go down, since there would be no profit in getting new users to try drugs. Protecting drug users against themselves costs the rest of us too much: in dollars, in safety and in freedom. Collett, Merril.
- Je devais tuer le pape (Témoignage, document) (French Edition)!
- Scrutinizing Drug War Propaganda.
- The Rise of Reefer Madness.
- Billy Pigeon for President?
- Leonora Carrington, la gran rebelde (Spanish Edition).
- A Brief History of the Drug War | Drug Policy Alliance.
- Love cannabis?!
McWilliams, John C. The Protectors: Harry J. Anslinger and the Federal Bureau. Of Narcotics, Newark: University of Delaware Press. Nadelmann, Ethan. Drug Legalization Debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Rosenberger, Leif R. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate. Publishing Co. Sharp, Elaine B. New York,. Trebach, Arnold. The Beat Generation emerged early in the decade, when a group of young people began to unite in their rejection of conventional society in favor of artistic and bohemian ideals.
The Beatniks also enjoyed experimenting with drugs, particularly marijuana. The drug started gaining traction in the U. The roots of this movement are mired in a racism that still persists in how drug policies are carried out in the U. In the s, Prohibition was repealed in the middle of the Great Depression. Straight-laced bureaucrats looking for another target turned their attention to marijuana, which, at the time, was mostly being used in the Mexican and black communities. They painted the drug —and the communities using it—as a threat to the already crippled country and began the process of banning it.
Since then, lawmakers have been doing a do-si-do with the drug. Over the decades, stricter enforcement and the passing of mandatory sentencing laws have traded off with repeals of those laws and efforts at legalization. Today, nine states have legalized marijuana with 29 allowing medical marijuana , but, as far as the federal government is concerned, the drug is still cannabis non grata.
This page is provided by Altmetric. Altmetric Badge. Readers on mendeley 49 Mendeley. You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more. View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions. Twitter Demographics The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output.
Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled. Mendeley readers.
Related Drug War Propaganda
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved