Ruffini Ponchiroli e Associati – Proprietà Industriale – Industrial Property
Il sito utilizza cookie tecnici per migliorare i servizi offerti e ottimizzare l'esperienza dell'utente. Proseguendo la navigazione - senza modificare le impostazioni del browser - accetti di ricevere i cookie.
- The Shadow of the Cross (The Eagle throughout the Ages Book 1)?
- Squillace, Nicola.
- Navigation menu;
- Walking Worthy As a Son of God (Walking Worthy Series for Men Book 1).
Se non desideri ricevere i cookie, modifica le impostazioni del tuo browser, ma sappi che alcuni servizi non funzioneranno correttamente. Per saperne di piu'. Stakeholders can provide authorizations but they can also contribute to change and improve the system. Wiki Loves Monuments has been a success in Italy: no other country had more photographers participating to the contest and the contributed photos are accessed millions of times each month on Wikimedia sites alone.
Success is the result of hard work, not of favourable conditions.
UPDATE: Guide to Italian Legal Research and Resources on the Web
It required over 3 FTE staff, dozens volunteers, the association of Italian photographers, over 40 local events "wikigite" and no less than official partners in local entities. Yet, much more is left to do: participants could only take photos of Pompei and some other items, a fraction of Italy's cultural heritage. The main obstacle to the promotion of Italian culture is "Codice Urbani", a law which forces photographers to seek an authorisation for every single object contained in their photos, even less than 50 years old: enquire each local entity about protected status, then, ask authorisation, then pay fees if required.
For objects created in the last years, an additional obstacle is copyright, given the lack of freedom of panorama. Citizens and well-meaning persons can't survive such bureaucracy, which we have to handle for them, working around many law exceptions. This uncovers three wrong assumptions of the law: 1 all reproductions are the same; 2 commercial use must be restricted; 3 profit is bad and must be shared with fees. In reality: 1 a photo is not a calque, downloading a photo is not shooting with flash; 2 copyleft protects culture better; 3 fees hamper citizens and institutions alike, but protect the publishers' monopolies.
It should be noted that expressions like "minor assets" beni minori and "degraded images" immagini degradate are no good for anyone and they should not be the terms of a negotiation. They reduce the importance of content made accessible, they understate the relevance of this cultural heritage which makes even questionable its reasonable presence on Wikipedia and the concept of degraded rises the question of why people should accept on the Wikimedia projects content that is defined as degraded made in purpose less relevant, useful, good - and by the way, how about if someone finds the same image in a better quality?
73681 ICGN Milan Magazine
To trigger the improvement of Wikipedia and the engagement of people in contributing in doing it, let's change the expressions or let's ask full access to a selection of cultural heritage in specific territories, or let's ask full access to anything expect a limited list of cultural heritage  open by default. Full access means also full image resolution.
It can be taken into consideration the law about Freedom of information in Italy related to the law Legge 7 agosto n. At the moment last update March to upload in Italy an image of Italian cultural heritage we ask for authorizations. This complex process of authorizations makes "Contributing to the Wikimedia projects with images and content about the Italian cultural heritage" possible but not simple.
Wikimedia Italia is supporting the Coalizione Nazionale per le Competenze Digitali and it is part of its scientific committee. Works explaining why the public domain must be defended and expanded, though not always dealing explicitly with "cultural heritage" laws which don't exist everywhere. From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki. There is nothing natural about these shifts in the law; they are simply the newest episode in a long running debate within Western society.
Il ministero dei Beni culturali risponde all'interrogazione di Grillini: lecito fotografare e riprodurre liberamente i beni culturali. Cassazione , Cassazione The Public Domain vs. Thomas Margoni, The digitisation of cultural heritage: originality, derivative works and non original photographs , Modolo, Il sogno infranto delle libere riproduzioni. Serlorenzi, V. Boi, I. Jovine, M. Stacca in press. Open Data in archeologia. Una questione giuridica o culturale? In Grossi, P. Archeologia e Calcolatori, Supplemento 7.
In Cignoni P. Archeologia e Calcolatori , Supplemento 2.
Boi, A. Marras, C. Santagati, Open Access and archaeology in Italy: an overview and a proposa l.
Advocating for the public domain [ edit ] Works explaining why the public domain must be defended and expanded, though not always dealing explicitly with "cultural heritage" laws which don't exist everywhere. Severine Dusollier. Paul J. The Public Domain. Routledge, Leonhard Dobusch. Randal C.
- Italian cultural heritage on the Wikimedia projects - Meta?
- esicywowyq.tk:Kindle Store:Kindle eBooks:eBooks in Foreign Languages:Italian:Law?
- CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!.
Access and the Public Domain. Alex Clark — Brenda Chawner. Enclosing the public domain: The restriction of public domain books in a digital environment. ISSN
Related Codice della proprietà industriale (Italia) (Italian Edition)
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved